Why I Keep Returning to Fated Mates
If you’ve read more than one of my books, you probably already know I love writing fated mates. Even when I tell myself I’m going to try something different, the trope somehow finds its way into the story. It’s not like I fight it...teehee.
But seriously, what draws me to fated mates is the idea of two people being pulled toward each other by an unseen force neither of them fully understands.
But that doesn’t guarantee an easy relationship.
Even with fated mates, adding push-and-pull and conflict is not meant to drag out the story, but to show their fears, anger, and doubts about the relationship. To me, those elements give the story the emotional depth it needs. And I think that is what makes it a little different from the insta-love trope.
With fated mates, the recognition can happen before love does. A character might know who their mate is without knowing anything about the person. What makes them laugh? What hurts their feelings? Do they need space when they’re upset, or do they need someone to stay close? Those are things a bond cannot necessarily explain.
Of course, fated mates and insta-love can overlap, and an immediate love story can still have conflict. I mean, this trope gives me room to explore what happens between recognizing a mate and learning how to be with them.
Fate may bring the couple together, but it should not build the entire relationship for them. They still need reasons to fall in love beyond instinct, scent, or supernatural recognition. They must learn who the other person truly is, build trust, and decide whether they are willing to build a life together.
Check out Michel & James https://www.giareaves.com/giaebooks/p/michel-james
One reason I like writing about fated mates is that, in my stories, there’s no cheating, or there shouldn’t be. The idea of wolves mating for life really draws me in, and I apply that to my omegaverse worldbuilding. That doesn’t mean I would never write cheating in my books, because I understand temptation and how it can drive a plot forward. But I would explore that in a contemporary plot, not a fated-mate one. I write fiction, and even real life can imitate fiction. After all, I’ve used real-life experiences in my books, but I also exaggerate them in many ways to take the reality out of them.
I also think that when fate is involved, mistakes don’t happen. I get it. Even that is a learning process, and it can be messy. Imagine being someone who likes to control their life, only to find out fate made a major decision without consulting you.
Like, seriously, excuse me? Couldn’t we have met first? LOL.
Then there is the other person, who may have been waiting for this moment their entire life. To them, finding their mate might feel like the answer to everything they’ve hoped for. Meanwhile, their mate is trying to figure out how to breathe without panicking. Neither reaction has to mean that one character cares more than the other. They may simply be approaching the same experience from very different perspectives.
That is one reason the trope gives me so much to work with. The circumstances can be similar, but the reactions need not be. Someone who has seen a loving partnership may welcome their mate with open arms. Someone who has been hurt may wonder what accepting the bond will cost. Another character might be perfectly comfortable with the connection but have no idea how to make room for a partner in their everyday life.
Those differences also give writers ways to change up the fated mates trope and make it their own. We can start with the same idea of two people destined for each other, but change how they recognize the bond, what they believe about it, or what accepting it means in their world. What one character has spent their life hoping for might be something another was raised to fear. The bond is familiar, but where a writer takes it can be completely different.
Accepting the bond right away does not mean there is nothing left to explore. Two people can want each other and still disagree. They can be committed and still struggle to communicate. Sometimes the problem lies outside the relationship, and the interesting part is seeing how they work together when that pressure arrives.
I try to keep this in mind while working on Parker’s Demon. Their bond starts the romance, but it doesn’t replace it.
Parker and Aoi share a connection. It’s been that way since book one, but their story is about more than the existence of a mate bond. While one character felt it from the beginning, the other resisted it for reasons they didn’t share at the time. But rather than outright rejecting the bond, he pretends it doesn’t exist. But when both fully recognize the bond, they are willing to face risks and overcome challenges for each other.
What interests me about that kind of resistance is what lies beneath it. A character can deny their feelings out loud while their actions tell a completely different story. They notice when the other person is missing. They worry about their safety. They remember something small they probably wish they had forgotten. For someone pretending there is no connection, they are paying an awful lot of attention... LOL.
Those little moments give the relationship room to grow. A dramatic declaration has its place, but so does listening when a mate shares something difficult or respecting a boundary when instinct urges them to move closer. I want room for both the supernatural pull and the everyday choices that help two people feel safe with each other.
If I were offering a bit of writing advice to someone exploring this trope, I would start there. Think about what your characters genuinely enjoy about each other. Set the bond aside for a moment: what draws them to spend time together? Is it their humor, their kindness, their stubbornness, or the way one person sees something in the other that everyone else overlooks?
I would also think about why a character resists. Fear of losing their independence is different from fear of being abandoned. Doubting the bond is different from believing in it but feeling unworthy of a mate. Knowing the reason helps give that hesitation purpose and gives the other character something meaningful to respond to.
The same applies to conflict. If the couple keeps having the same argument, what changes each time? Does someone reveal a little more? Does one finally understand why a particular subject hurts? They don't have to solve everything immediately, but I like feeling like they are learning something as they go.
There is also plenty of room to have fun with the rules. Writing fantasy lets me decide how a bond is recognized, what it means in that world, and how much the characters understand about it. That creates all kinds of possibilities, especially when their personal expectations do not match what actually happens.
Wow, that was a mindful…LOL…
This kind of stuff is why I love writing fantasy, but that’s for another day. Now remember, these are my opinions and no one else’s.
For me, returning to fated mates means exploring that experience through another couple’s eyes. I get to discover what they welcome, what scares them, and what finally makes them comfortable enough to let the other person in. And yes, I also get to enjoy the stubborn ones who insist they are completely unaffected, even as they do everything possible to keep their mate close.
You know the type...teehee.
What about you?
Do you prefer fated mates who accept their bond right away, or the stubborn ones who fight it every step of the way?
